- How to verify GPG signatures on Bitcoin software
- How to check SHA256 checksums for file integrity
- How to review open-source code (even if you don't code)
- How to detect malicious wallet software
- Real tools and workflows for verification
Why Verification Matters
In traditional finance, you trust banks, auditors, and regulators. In Bitcoin, you are the auditor. Anyone can slip malicious code into wallets, exchanges, or tools to steal your funds.
- ❌ Fake wallet apps on app stores
- ❌ Compromised downloads from unofficial mirrors
- ❌ Backdoored software from malicious GitHub clones
- ❌ Man-in-the-middle attacks during download
- ❌ Supply chain attacks on dependencies
Verification Layer 1: GPG Signatures
GPG (GNU Privacy Guard) signatures prove that software was released by the legitimate developer, not an imposter.
How GPG Signatures Work
- Developer creates software and signs it with their private GPG key
- Signature file (.asc or .sig) is published alongside the software
- You download both the software and signature
- You verify using the developer's public key
- GPG confirms the signature matches → software is authentic
Step-by-Step: Verify Bitcoin Core
1 Install GPG
2 Import Developer Public Keys
⚠️ Critical: Verify the fingerprint on multiple sources (official website, GitHub, social media) to avoid man-in-the-middle attacks.
3 Download Bitcoin Core + Signature
4 Verify the Signature
5 Verify File Integrity (Checksum)
📝 Verification Layer 2: SHA256 Checksums
Checksums detect file tampering. Even a single bit changed in a file produces a completely different hash.
Real Example: Verifying Sparrow Wallet
Why this matters: If a hacker compromises the download server and swaps the file with a backdoored version, the checksum won't match—and you'll know immediately.
🤔 What if the checksum is also compromised?
This is why you combine GPG + checksums:
- GPG signature proves the checksum file is authentic
- Checksum proves the software file matches the signed checksum
- Together, they create a chain of trust
An attacker would need to compromise both the developer's GPG key AND the download server—much harder.
👀 Verification Layer 3: Code Review
Even if signatures check out, you can (and should) review the code. You don't need to be a developer to do basic verification.
Non-Coder Verification Tactics
🔎 Check GitHub Activity
- How many contributors? (More = harder to collude)
- How many stars/forks? (Popularity = more scrutiny)
- Recent commits? (Active maintenance = security patches)
- Issue tracker? (Users reporting bugs openly = transparency)
🧑💻 Read the Code (Yes, Really!)
Even if you don't understand every line, look for:
- ❌ Obfuscated code (unusual variable names, compressed code)
- ❌ External API calls (where is data being sent?)
- ❌ Hardcoded addresses (is someone sneaking in their own Bitcoin address?)
- ✅ Comments and documentation (legitimate projects explain their code)
🗣️ Check Community Feedback
- Search "[wallet name] + scam" on Reddit, Twitter, Bitcoin Talk
- Look for security audits (reputable wallets publish them)
- Check if it's recommended by known Bitcoin educators
- Be wary of projects with only positive reviews (astroturfing)
For Coders: Deep Verification
Real-World Checklist
Before Installing ANY Bitcoin Software:
⚠️ Red Flags to Avoid
- Has no source code available (closed source)
- Requires custodial control (they hold your keys)
- Has no GPG signatures or checksums
- Promises "guaranteed returns" or "staking rewards" on Bitcoin
- Has sketchy download sources (random forums, Telegram groups)
- Asks for seed phrase to "verify" or "recover" funds
- Has zero community presence or discussion
🔗 Trusted Resources
-
🔗 Bitcoin Core Downloads
Official Bitcoin Core releases with GPG signatures
-
🔗 Bitcoin Core GitHub
Full source code and release verification instructions
-
🔗 WalletScrutiny
Community-driven wallet verification database
-
🔗 Bitcoin.org Wallet Guide
Curated list of vetted Bitcoin wallets
Key Takeaways
- Don't trust, verify: Always verify software signatures and checksums before installation
- Multiple sources: Cross-check fingerprints and hashes from different channels
- Open source preferred: Closed-source wallets = blind trust
- Test first: Use small amounts before trusting new software
- Community matters: Active development and transparent discussion = safer
- When in doubt, skip: Missing verification tools? Don't use it.